MyFox
 

Bob_Ward's Blog

by Bob_Ward from Dedham

Last Post 16 days, 20 hours Ago


I believe the strongest evidence against Neil Entwistle in his double murder trial are the statements he made after the murders of his wife Rachel and their nine-month-old daughter Lillian in their rented Hopkinton home.

Today, after devastating DNA evidence was introduced (more about that in a moment) two of Neil Entwistle's UK friends took the stand. Both men were with Neil the night before he was arrested.

At dinner, Benjamin Prior asked Neil what happened. And what Neil allegedly said to his friend is loaded with inconsistencies.

Benjamin says that Neil told him that on the morning of the murders, Neil left the house, and when he returned at around 11am, he discovered the bodies of Rachel and Lillian in the upstairs bedroom.

Upset, Neil ran downstairs to get a knife to kill himself, lost his nerve, and then drove to Carver because he knew his father in law had a gun collection. Once there, Neil settled down and realized he needed to tell someone what had happened.

Neil said he drove to the workplace of Priscilla Matterazzo, Rachel's mom, and told her what he found at the house. Then he went back to the Carver house where grieving family members were gathering. At some point he speaks over the phone to Massachusetts State Police.

Eventually, Neil wants to be alone, so he drives to the only other place in  Massachusetts he knows: Logan Airport. And eventually he gets the idea to go home to the UK so he can be with his own family.

Neil allegedly tells his friends he is having financial problems. He says he and Rachel bought the Hopkinton home with a 100 percent mortgage, and that they bought the BMW, but neither had jobs. He said he would probably declare bankruptcy in the UK.

He said the couple's financial problems were compounded by the fact that Rachel wanted to completely furnish the Hopkinton house with furniture bought on credit.

Another UK friend, Daschiel Munding testified that Neil told him essentially the same story with some key differences.

Neil told him that he remembered the back door to the Hopkinton house was left unlocked when he went to do an errand at Staples on the morning of the murders, and that it was still unlocked when he returned.

Munding says that Neil told him he went to Carver because he knew his father-in-law had a gun collection. And Neil wanted to make sure the guns were secure, that nothing was wrong.

On the day of Rachel and Lillian's funeral, Neil told Munding that he spent time at the place where he proposed to Rachel. When pressed where that was, Munding didn't know.

The stories are key because we know Neil did not show up at Priscilla's workplace, he did not return to the Carver home to grieve with friends, he did not speak with Massachusetts State Police before he returned to the UK. Also, the Hopkinton house was rented, so too was the BMW.

In addition to all of this, there is still more.

To the DNA.

My colleague, Ted Daniel, has blogged about the DNA on the murder weapon.

Here's more DNA evidence.

We now know the DNA found on the bedroom walls, away from the bed, belongs to Rachel. Those blood stains were four feet nine inches off the ground. Rachel was five feet tall. It looks to me like Rachel was shot there and then placed on the bed.

The sperm found on Rachel's clothes and in her body belonged to Neil Entwistle.

Still more evidence.

Neil Entwistle did not attend his wife and daughter's funeral, but he did order flowers from a Pembroke florist.

Neil ordered an orange rose and a white lilly with a card that read: "My orange rose and my lilly for always xoxoxo.

Neil also ordered flowers for his parents, and the next day he called with another order for other family and friends in the UK.

The florist testified the caller identified himself as Neil Entwistle and he gave two phone numbers, both of which were UK numbers.

Finally, a forensic computer technician testified about a Toshiba laptop and its hard drive. On January 16, just days before the murder, someone logging on as "ent" conducted a Google search for the phrase "How to Kill With A Knife." That search was done at 12:54:45.

And with that, court recessed for the day.

Again, what do you think?

Bob Ward
15 Comments |  Add a Comment

Member Comments Total Comments: 15
Page 1 of 1
fenwaydav read my blog view my photos
Jun 17, 2008 | 11:01 PM

Have I been sleeping and missed this whole thing with the sperm. Just like that you throw a sentence in "the sperm found on Rachel's clothes and in her body belonged to Neil Entwistle". I was baffled so I went to boston.com. They had sex sometime before she died it said. Knowing this nut job, are they sure it was before? How can they tell before or after?

Xantun read my blog view my photos
Jun 18, 2008 | 12:35 AM

Bob, methinks this proves the old adage "Give a dumbass enough rope and they'll hang themselves." I remember hearing about the Google thing when all this was going on, but combined with all this other evidence, I'm thinking the defense is going to have a REALLY hard time, despite the issue of the 1st "wellness check" not finding anything wrong. (And I'm really glad that no one told Neil about the ways to protect your search records from being collected!)

Dave, that issue was brought up Monday, when the jury was shown the clothes that Lillian and Rachel died in. Sperm had been found on Rachel's nightgown and underwear and had been tested for DNA, but it wasn't revealed whose DNA it was. I don't know if they can tell for sure or not when they had sex, but I have to wonder if the defense isn't going to bring this issue up and try to say that if the sex was before Rachel was killed, it obviously wasn't Neil who committed the murders, because he loved his wife, or something equally desperate.

fenwaydav read my blog view my photos
Jun 18, 2008 | 1:12 AM

Xantun, Sex and Sperm don't spell love. As we all know......

Chip read my blog view my photos
Jun 18, 2008 | 5:44 AM

He had sex with her...then shot her and a baby...his baby...the depths of human depravity...

fenwaydav read my blog view my photos
Jun 18, 2008 | 5:56 AM

Chip, If he is so much in the depths of human depravity, what makes you convinced it was before?

Chip read my blog view my photos
Jun 18, 2008 | 7:38 AM

I'm sorry David, I don't understand your question....Oh My God....I just got it. I hadn't even gone to that level. AFTER he killed them? Sweet Jesus in Heaven.

As I said in Ted Daniel's blog, I'd volunteer to execute him personally, gratis. June offered to give me a ride!!! I spark him up; she sticks a fork in him to make sure he's done.

June, if you're listening...I'll buy the gas...

Kelldog
Jun 18, 2008 | 9:45 AM

Hello Bob,
And another piece of the puzzle falls into place.Can there really be anybody that thinks this guy is innocent.Guilty as charged

Bob_Ward read my blog view my photos
Jun 18, 2008 | 10:47 AM

Hi Kelldog,

In fairness, the defense hasn't called any witnesses, but this isn't looking good at all for Neil Entwistle.

Again, I don't know how he gets around his own statements.

BW

JuneInMA read my blog view my photos
Jun 18, 2008 | 11:02 AM

Chip,

We'll even bring sandwiches!! I'm ready for this bum to go!!!!

guti1016 read my blog
Jun 18, 2008 | 1:32 PM

Bob Ward and all who read this....With the cost of legal trials, lawyers, etc maybe if when a crime occurs like this alledged murder and you know it's him but procedure takes a long long time, that person, Entwistle in this case just simply vanishes...Never to be seen or heard from again. He is delivered to a special group and goes for a "ride"....No loop holes, No appeals, No stays, Nothing !!!! "Next case step forward."

justwondering67 read my blog
Jun 18, 2008 | 2:05 PM

Bob,

I agree, his inconsistent statements to his friends are troubling for the defense. They also do not make sense. Especially when he tells them he drives to Carver to make sure the gun collection is okay?? Why, did he suspect that someone in the Matterazzo family would want to kill Rachel and the baby?

DNA is also a problem for the defense. How did Rachel's DNA get on the gun. Do you think we will hear from the ME? I would like to learn more about the angle of the bullet fired into Rachel. Thanks. Jean

fenwaydav read my blog view my photos
Jun 18, 2008 | 3:23 PM

Chip, I know it is a very sick thought I presented, but this guy is one strange cookie. Who the hell knows what he's capable of. That act has been done. We may never no exactly how it ended for those 2 poor people who's only crime was knowing him.

Chip read my blog view my photos
Jun 18, 2008 | 4:20 PM

Bob,

God bless you for maintaining objectivity...mine's gone. I should be more like you...but the evidence you and Ted have given us is enough for me. I trust both your objectivity and balance, in a climate where I am usually skeptical.

I'm ready to spark the b*stard up.

colleenagnes
Jun 18, 2008 | 9:38 PM

Bob, I say this animal should be taken out into the woods and hung from the highest tree , left there for the other animals to tear apart and divy up! he deserves that and more for killing his poor wife and innocent little baby....... the only thing rachel did wrong was get hooked up with him.

Xantun read my blog view my photos
Jun 18, 2008 | 9:40 PM

Yes, Dave, we all know that sex doesn't always mean love, BUT, that doesn't mean that the angle couldn't potentially be exploited by a defense team who has to throw doubt in the minds of the jurors. What we all say here on the blogs doesn't matter in the long run. What matters is if the defense can plant that seed of doubt in the minds of the 16 people who are in the process of deciding Neil's fate.

Chip, I'm with you...With everything I'm hearing, I'm finding it harder by the moment to believe that this guy could be the wrong guy.

Page 1 of 1


Write your comment below:




Bob_Ward

I am a reporter/anchor specializing in crime and regular features such as New England's Unsolved and Mass Most Wanted.

Member Since: 10/16/2006