MyFox
 

Panic At Nabisco

by Graham_Cracker from Plympton

Last Post 4 days, 3 hours Ago


The media is very much a "damned if they do - damned if they don't" entity.

If they do cover the all of the news, they risk getting accused of "hype".  If they don't cover certain stories, everyone is screaming, "What's going on with...?(x, y, & z)".

Take the latest controversies over Tom Brady, for example...

It is relevant to report on the fact that Tom Brady - beloved Patriots quarterback who has taken his team to an undefeated season thus far with only the Superbowl left - was wearing a protective boot of some kind.  It's also relevant to report the fact that he was a no-show at practice, no matter if he was just waiting for the media to leave or what the reason!

But as usual, we have countless, implacable people who can't wait to throw their verbal tomatoes at the media; accusing them of so-called "hype".  Even though if nothing was said about Tom Brady, you can bet this same lynch-mob would be screaming "What the hell is going on?  What's the news on Tom Brady?  Is his foot OK or not?"

I really wish the media would conspire to be mum on a highly sought-after story just once - just to witness the outcry upon such an omission.  The hypocrisy would be undeniable.  The media could then collectively turn around and say, "Well, we didn't want to be guilty of HYPE !"

Is "hype" merely reporting on any controversial story?  Because I thought it was sensationalizing, and "amping-up" a controversial story.  I could have sworn that to have "hype", you had to do more than just report the facts; I thought you had to aggrandize the speculation and worry.  ...Dizzying editing, excitable voices, "swooshes"; unreasonable, wild speculations...all the earmarks of "hype". 

Simply saying "Tom Brady is wearing a protective boot.  Will he be OK for the Superbowl?" is not hype--it's journalism.  When someone is wearing a protective boot, of course it's reasonable to speculate on their well-being!  That does not make it hype!

TMZ hyped the story.  They used dizzying editing, excitable voices, fast camera-zooms...all of that...  Well, duh!  If you watch shows like TMZ and any tabloid-type of news program, hopefully you're smart enough to expect hype.  But don't even count them as "media".  It's not fair to the serious news broadcasts.  You cannot compare the Fox 25 News at 5:00 to TMZ; not fairly anyhow.

I want to know that Tom Brady is ready for the Superbowl.  I want to know the updates.  I want to stay informed and kept abreast of the updates.  Those of you who don't; shut off your TV's and give yourself a rectal exam.  But keep your hype to yourself.
3 Comments |  Add a Comment

Member Comments Total Comments: 3
Page 1 of 1
Xantun read my blog view my photos
Jan 26, 2008 | 8:38 PM

Graham, not that I'm a sports fan, but I agree with you on this. Tom Brady's health is extremely relevant, with the Super Bowl coming up. Obsessive reporting on someone who's NOT relevant, however, tends to fall into my personal category of hype, as well as a facet of a person that's not relevant. (See Paris Hilton, Britney Spears for people, or if Tom Brady decides to dye his hair neon green for luck or something similar for the facet.)

Graham_Cracker read my blog view my photos
Jan 28, 2008 | 9:36 AM

Well, yeah...of course reporting on Britney Spears is hype. I won't argue with that, Xan.
But I don't even understand getting all upset with the New England media for constantly updating us on Tom Brady and any other Patriots news. It's all anyone is talking about! Shouldn't the news join in?
I think that a lot of people love to use mediums of the media (these blogs, emails to news programs, letters to the Herald, etc.) to make themselves feel important by "talking down" to them - as if criticizing automatically hoists them "above" it (the media). It's one of many very bogus mechanisms that frustrated, downtrodden people use to manufacture a false sense of importance. I'm not saying that everyone who criticizes the media falls under such a category, but I think sometimes it's obvious that it couldn't possibly be anything else.
Take the woman who emailed Kevin Lemanowicz, for example; she said about a less-than-dead-on forecast, "to say that I'm livid is an understatement". ...Absolutely psychotic. If you look at the definition of the word "livid", and then take her statement at face value (not as hyperbole) then it's absolutely NUTS. ...A perfect example of a desperate individual projecting her insecurities/frustrations onto someone who can't fight back...in a futile attempt to hoist themselves above them. It's really just sad.

Xantun read my blog view my photos
Jan 30, 2008 | 12:47 AM

Graham, in my time online, I've learned that there are some people that seriously defy all forms of logic. They seem to thrive on an internet connection.

And even though I'm NOT a sports fan and really don't care about the Super Bowl, reporting on the Patriots and Tom Brady is just a fact of life around here this time of year, if the Patriots have made it into the Super Bowl. Just like Red Sox during the fall, etc. People need to find the damn mute button or channel change button on their remotes if they don't want to see this stuff. (I already know for a fact we're in the minority!) Griping about it doesn't do anything but make people ignore you.

Page 1 of 1


Write your comment below:




Graham_Cracker

I used to hate growing up...now I'm glad it's happening. Should I be worried about that? *IRONY*

Member Since: 2/23/2007