Happyg's Blog

As he continues to express his visions for increased hostilities in Afghanistan and Pakistan, someone needs to tell Barack the truth. and here it is:

Pakistan has it's own set of special circumstances. The SWAT area has been under attack from the Taliban for almost a year now. It's Muslims killing Muslims because the moderates will not adhere to the radical extremists. But each and everytime a moderate speaks up, he is killed. Just the other day another moderate Mullah was gunned down because he proclaimed that the radical "islamists" were not Muslins at all.
For all their problems, my best source, (A former reporter from Pakistan) informs me that the Pakistani people as a whole would not welcome US or any other involvement. He did say that an armed "civil war" type of effort must occur within their borders to rid the nation of the many ISI and other military types that have embraced both Al qaeda and the Taliban. He also noted that funding may also be coming from India. He explained that while India's population is mostly Hindu, by sheer numbers the amount of Muslims in India exceed that of Pakistan. Violence is on the horizon, and they don't want us to help. Someone needs to inform Barack, he thinks it's a good idea to intervene.

I guess today we found out which direction Meet The Press is headed. Brokaw coddled two Democrat governors and the most liberal Republican governor, all in one show.

Speaking of Moyers, a couple of years back he sign off on NOW stating that he was pursing some interests in the "private" sector. How'd that work out Bill? Not so hot I guess. A year later you were back at the public trough spreading your socialist/communist views every chance you get. But you did get to drop off  the NOW slot to that other socialist David Brancaccio. And now you are two. Who says our government doesn't sponsor terrorism?

If I could find a way to suggest that our Massachusetts elections be monitored for fraud without impuning these United States of America, I surely would.

Why do our elected officials feel that politics should be a "career choice"? Politics were never supposed to be a life long career path, only a way for concerned citizens to give input into our society for the betterment of said society. Now we have senators and representatives who sell their souls to maintain their seats, the public will be damned. Barring demeaning intervention into our election process, how about this style of term limits ?[One six year term for all offices-no lobbying or associating with any agencies who have any access to government contracts for ten years after leaving office]