MyFox
 

MattyG's Blog

by MattyG from MA

Last Post 12 days, 18 hours Ago


Business as usual from a Republican
Feb 27, 2008 | 10:02 PM
Category: Political
Report This Post

It's not new that a GOP candidate will use something about an opponent to suggest they're un-American or immoral. The Bush political Mafia has a track record of going after opponents in that way, and they will even go after decorated war heroes who happen to stand in their way.
 
McCain looks like he's taking up their banner in 2008 and now Barack Obama is the looking back at him. What's problematic is McCain was once on the business end of these tactics, in 2000, and is now embracing the politics of his former arch-rival. He's certainly not going to do the real dirty work himself, of course. Why should he when people like Bill Cunningham are lurking under a nearby rock to do it for him?
 
And, don't tell me someone from McCain's campaign didn't know what Cunningham was going to say. That flake plants the idea that Obama is one of ''them'' and McCain comes along and says he's shocked - Shocked! - that someone would say such a thing and he certainly would never have condoned such a thing.
 
Obama is forced to fight back because Kerry let himself be challenged without a sufficient response and we saw how that worked out for him. Obama will have a surrogate to do his dirty work, too.
 
Barack Hussein Obama should be able to embrace his middle name with pride in public. I guess that he can't do it is proof that dirty politics does work. A name like Hussein is now profane after Bush's administration. I'm more apt to think of the late King Hussein of Jordan than Saddam Hussein. That Hussein was not a perfect man but he turned into a positive force in the world.
35 Comments |  Add a Comment

Member Comments Total Comments: 35
Page 1 of 2
1
2
 Last
FisherCat read my blog view my photos
Feb 27, 2008 | 11:12 PM

You forgot the Grand Mufti of Israel al Husseini who wanted to unite the Pan Arab Nations 1930's in unity to take down all other countries thats why he hooked up with HITLER an ran 5 divisions of Islamo Fighters in Bosnia...an fought along the SS...an Iran is using the same Hitler Youth Program to train their children to be SHAHID'S suicide bombers
this was started by the Muslim Brotherhood i Egypt 1920's an then they got the boot from Nasser in the early 1940's an then they went to Saudi Arabia an opened the RADICAL ISLAMIC MADRASES this is where Bin Ladin tutored under Zawahiri....the liberal left cant blame President Bush he wasn't even born in the 1920's..an 1930's as far as Barak Hussein Obama i would watch out for the Clintons things happen to their friends an enemies..LOL!!!!!!
MattyG read my blog
Feb 28, 2008 | 1:11 AM

Obama wasn't alive when that BLEEP happened either.

Let's go back to King Hussein. His grandfather, as-Sayyid Abdullah I, King of Jordan, supported the U.N. mandate that CREATED Israel. He supported the UK in WWI. He was killed in 1951 by a Palestinian while visiting Al Aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem.
FisherCat read my blog view my photos
Feb 28, 2008 | 6:56 AM

Palestine? there was no such place called Palestine, those lands were Jordan's if i remember right an the Bedouins were Jordanians who used that land for goat herding...LOL!!!!!

Iran an its Imams want a glorious return of Islam like Saladin who fought off Richard the Lion Hearted....an Saladin attacked his Muslim Brothers countries an slaughtered them for power an riches an the return of Persian Rule over the world....its sort like how people look romantically at the Native American Indians here the HURONS would slaughter other tribes for resources an hunting lands and other tribes to were as ruthless as the HURONS...bottom line people fight an loose wars an to the victor goes the spoils...
Happyg read my blog
Feb 28, 2008 | 3:08 PM

Actually, Kerry's "response" was to lie to his base.And they spouted those lies as truth all during the campaign.Even after the election, when Kerry admitted he hadn't released all his undeleted military records, he again said he would, and still didn't.Not until four months later, after he and his staff "reviewed" them did he allowed three liberal reporters to read them and "tell us" what they said. As an American I find it offensive that so many Kerry apologists find that this disclosure equates with unabated access.John Kerry defended himself the only way he could. He lied, then lied again.
captainseapig read my blog view my photos
Feb 28, 2008 | 5:36 PM

My Uncles first name was Adolph he was born in 1922. After the war he insisted that people call him Alex. There was this guy named Hitler who ruined his first name. Do you know of any boys named Adolph since? It's over for that name. It's over for the Hussein name too, at least in America.
nomorehacks read my blog view my photos
Feb 28, 2008 | 6:19 PM

I don't see "Hussain" on obama's political sign's. Maybe he is'nt PROUD of it either. Although his wife has enough pride for both of them. Not !
Chip read my blog view my photos
Feb 28, 2008 | 6:52 PM

MattyG,

"It's not new that a GOP candidate will use something about an opponent to suggest they're un-American or immoral. The Bush political Mafia has a track record of going after opponents in that way"

Not too hypocritical are you? Mafia? Immoral?

Sheesh

Oh, and by the way, it is, and always will be until my dying day, un-American to leave 3,000 soldiers bodies and 3,000 civilians here in graves for abaondoned causes.
MattyG read my blog
Feb 28, 2008 | 9:10 PM

Nomorehacks you inspired me. Thank you.

I went to John McCain's campaign website and I couldn't locate his middle name anywhere. It's also not on his dopey campaign signs. Is he ashamed his father couldn't spell Sidney correctly? Please tell me cuz I need to know.

Happyg, what I find offensive is that you refuse to respect the service of a decorated war hero like John Kerry. That his service is questioned by conservatives for political reasons is a disgrace and reveals more about the accuser than Kerry.

Chip, my comments are made in reference to a series of unfounded attacks on the patriotism of both Democrats running for President. Liberals like me won't ignore these kind of provocations.

We also won't allow that awful, crappy mess in Iraq to go on and on indefinitely. First of all, the 3,973 soldiers killed in Iraq weren't lost because of the 3,000 victims on 9/11. You can't seem to remember Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11. The way to remember innocent victims of terrorism and people who sacrifice their lives while serving in the military is with the truth.

Secondly, I don't want us to turn 7,000 killed into 10,000 deaths or 14,000 deaths. Finding more people to bury doesn't add meaning to those who've already died. They died so others wouldn't have to.
FisherCat read my blog view my photos
Feb 28, 2008 | 10:39 PM

I want the Demoncrats to pull out the troops that will be the end of their party! The Iraq war is a mess? It was a stroke of genius by our courageous President Clinton should have done after he read the DECEMBER P.D.B. in 1998 days after he attacked Iraq...in the P.D.B. is spelled it out clearly that Bin Ladin was going to hijack airplanes an by February he issued his FATWAH an spelled out his outrage over President Clinton for attacking Babylon i.e. Iraq...an a little later the 9/11 plot was given the go the engagement to put the plot forth was in the works...an Clinton knew!thats why he put forth 5 Executive orders some while he was on vacation in the finger lakes region to block Al Qaeda funds an asset's an by August Usamah had met with Iran's Revolutionary Guard an made a alliance to fight the United States to wipe us off the planet its all in the Intelligence reports an then there is that 1998 Indictment of Bin Ladin an Al Qaeda for the 1993 World Trade Center bombing that Clinton sat on!!!!! so much for treating terrorism as a law enforcement issue! he didn't act! Clinton was PAPER TIGER! read my documents on my blog its all there!
Mike_in_Kingston read my blog view my photos
Feb 29, 2008 | 8:53 AM

MattyG

Would you prefer that those lives lost be civilians here on our soil?
The liberals won't understand what this is all about until there friends and family members are shot and buried in shallow graves for being infidels. These warmongering Jihadist, if their not fighting the UN or coalition forces their fighting each other. If we cannot peacefully coexist than I'm sorry they have to go. Sorry, I like me/us much better. Our way is not perfect but it's much better than theirs!

Leave it to your liberal media to paint such a bleak picture.

History repeats itself and lessons should be learned.

Apparently this is lost on most of you.

I respect Kerrys service record not the man. To many of his comrades had nothing nice to comment on their time served with him. At least Kerry served, unlike the draftdodging POS, POTUS uncle bubba! What was Gerry thinking when he pardoned him!
reasonguy read my blog
Feb 29, 2008 | 10:04 AM

Ahh yes the repetative blame game of the conservative automotom collective is always so predictable and unwilling to accept responsisbility for its actions. Blame Clinton for everything motto ignore all the failed policies of the Bush Administration. Fischercat run that by us again and tell us why we Americans love to pay more than an average of $3/gallon of gas, that we don't have worry about this thing called the federal deficit being the highest in history, that we should ignore that the dollar is weaker than the Canadian Loonie, that inflation is not just something you do to your tires, that it is alright to suspend habius corpus in order to let big brother spy on us sorry I meant to say protect us, ever since Bush took office. It must have gone over our heads why this country is doing so well with all these policies that seem to be a failure at every turn.
FisherCat read my blog view my photos
Mar 1, 2008 | 1:10 AM

reason guy, failed policies where? Iraq an the surge is going well, OIL PRICES? ask Joe Kennedy why he is in bed with the Mussolini of the new century Hugo Chavez, who has taken more than 13 trips to Iran an has bought 25 MIGS an the rights to produce Kalshnikovs an is seeking to buy from the Oligarchy of Russia 9-10 subs as his people suffer under one of the most oppressive banana republics we have seen in decades...Russia an Iran has a deal Vladimir Putin an his Oligarchy are building gas pipelines to the E.U. an former Soviet Union States like Georgia etc so they will have a strangle hold on NATURAL GAS AN OIL an Iran is in cahoots with them to drive down through all secular Muslim countries like Lebanon Jordan an Iraq if we were not there! to the Saudi Peninsula an eventually to Africa to control [ALL OIL IN THE MIDDLE EAST] an to promote President Tommy Ahmadinejad's grand vision of the return of Persian Rule under SHARIA LAW...we are in Iraq to block them from the TWELVERS Yummeh, the twelvers believe the 12TH IMAM will rise out of a well in Babylon/Iraq...an the return of PERISAN RULE will dominate the world once again...

OIL just read a indictment of a Brazilian i suspect a middle Easter connection of turning over highly sensitive software for OIL RIGS an training Iranians how to access our computers for Oil Rigs an refineries models of technology...espionage! an was http://neworleans.fbi.gov/dojpressrel/2008/no022808.htm
its going to get worse before it gets better Russia, North Korea, China, Venzuala are all in cahoots to take down THE UNITDE STATES an what ab
captainseapig read my blog view my photos
Mar 1, 2008 | 9:41 AM

I like the truth most people do. Some do not. The truth hurts especially if it points to our weakness and failings. What is the truth in this war. Basic simple truth, forget the politics and presidents, pretend they don't exist. That all their speeches and the pendents analysis is gone and doesn't exist. Clear your mind, no other influences but you and the universe.
Deep breath relax, now we begin, We were attacked, two planes filled with innocent people were rammed into two towers filled with innocent harmless people.
Next, lets find these bad guys, get close to them were they live and kill them, protect our families our country. We are in a long nasty search and destroy mission with scouts out everywhere in different countries trying to find the bad guys and destroy them. Simple. Ramifications complex, can you deal with the ramifications and the other penalties it will incur. Everything has a cost. We shall see. Some in our family whine and do not want to do the chore, others are jung ho, others are tired . Our choices in the next year will decide the course and other challenges will arise. Problems substituted for other problems. The cycle of life. What problems will we choose.
MattyG read my blog
Mar 1, 2008 | 11:11 PM

I don't accept the Bush premise that we are fighting them over there so we don't fight them here. If we aren't fighting them here, why do we have a Homeland Security department? Remember the attack on Fort Dix (NJ) we stopped? They're already here.

Fighting terrorism isn't just a military assault. It's also a domestic law enforcement issue. We need to fight terror at home and abroad.

Now, let's look at Iraq/Afghanistan. If we had kept the pressure on in Afghanistan with the full force of our military, our war there might look different. But, we have no troops able to beef up our presence there. Even before we invaded Iraq, more American GI's in Afghanistan might have caught Osama. As it turns out, he bought off an Afghan Northern Alliance leader to let him go. We shouldn't have trusted them.

Once again, I'll reiterate that Iraq wasn't involved in 9/11. The resources, money and lives lost there speak for themselves. We're up to around $1,000,000,000,000 now, and 4,000 Americans. We could have controlled Saddam and used him to balance Iran. We hurt our position and helped make Iran stronger. If we can fight with Stalin against Hitler, we could have dealt with Saddam.

We, collectively, have learned nothing. We overthrew Iran's gov't in 1953 which led to their current regime. We have no idea what Iraq will become and Bush never really considered that. Our interference in Iran should have served as a warning against invading Iraq.

If they want to kill themselves that is their right. That's not really my concern.
FisherCat read my blog view my photos
Mar 2, 2008 | 9:40 AM

Let him go? Clinton had Bin Ladin dead N_ts an let off the hook in 1999 in the Falconry Hunting Camp becuase Bin Ladin was Partying therewith Clintons Prince a Dubai Cash cow who he works for now Clinton should be brought up on charges for failing to uphold his Oath of Office for pure greed! an Madeline Albright too! she has ties to Dubai....

1st are you talking about TOROAH BORAH? miscalculation an even with all the troops they wanted its wasn't quaranteed that would have gotten Bin Ladin........Clinton had Mamoud THE LION OF PERSIA Northern Alliance with the C.I.A. on the ground an let Bin Ladin off the hook...for pure greed an Mahmoud payed the price Bin Ladin found out an sent his suicide bombers to blow him up! an they did!!!!!

9/11 should not have had to happen at all!!!!! an we should not have had to go to Afghanistan if Clinton had done his job period!!!!! in 1999 in 1998 he sat on a Indictment for the 1993 WORLD TRADE CENTER ATTACK an Clinton did nothing!!!!! years before 9/11....his excuse was he had no probable cause...LAWYER DOUBLE TALK....he had the 1998 Indictment so much for treating terrorism as a [Law Enforcement Issue!!!!!! did he sent States or the F.B.I. to apprehend Bin Ladin? no a matter fact after the U.S.S.COLE the Clinton appointee YEMEN Ambassador Barbara Bodine pulled all the PASSPORTS AN VISAS from John O'Neill an his F.B.I. Anti Terrorism team...dont blame Bush 6 months in office an Clinton gave him 9/11..
MattyG read my blog
Mar 2, 2008 | 1:43 PM

Fisherkitty I don't know who this ''Mamoud THE LION OF PERSIA'' dude is. I do know who Ahmad Shah Massoud aka Lion of Panjsher is. He was killed by bin Laden on September 9, 2001. In April 2001, Massoud addressed the European Parliament and warned of an imminent attack by Al Qaeda, supported by the Taliban. Since he was from Afghanistan, he might have known what he was talking about.

So before 9/11, Osama killed the man who would have helped us most in the coming fight in Afghanistan. Bush missed it. He missed the hijack warning in the summer. He could have stopped it.

In the Path to 9/11 movie, Massoud meets with a composite CIA agent character and tells him that if he's killed, an attack by Al Qaeda is imminent. This specific meeting probably never happened but it illustrates something was up that we missed. Oh, and the scene where Massoud and the CIA had sighted bin Laden and couldn't get approval to get him, well, that didn't happen either.

Clinton admitted he failed to get bin Laden. The current admin. never admits failures or mistakes.
FisherCat read my blog view my photos
Mar 2, 2008 | 2:38 PM

Matty when did Clinton have this Indictment for Bin Ladin an Al Qeada? look at the date http://www.fas.org/irp/news/1998/11/98110602_nlt.htmlr> years before 9/11 an before the U.S.S.COLE bombing an after the 2 African Embassy Bombing an Khobar Towers but that was Hizbollah..he sat on his rear an did nothing....an left for the next administration....
MattyG read my blog
Mar 2, 2008 | 3:17 PM

On 9/24/06 on "FOX News Sunday With Chris Wallace," Chris Wallace interviewed President Clinton. One subject was Clinton's efforts to get bin Laden.



From the transcript:

WALLACE: Do you think you did enough, sir?

CLINTON: No, because I didn't get him.

---------------------------------

Okay, Clinton didn't get him.

So, Bush is allowed to do nothing about him for eight months because Cinton didn't get him?

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,215397,00.html
fenwaydav read my blog view my photos
Mar 2, 2008 | 4:33 PM

Captain, You write about your uncle and the name of Adolf. True I really can't think of anyone I know at least with that name, but it hasn't completely gone by the wayside. There is a great product out there Adolf's meat tenderizer. I guess they are strong enough to stand by there product...
FisherCat read my blog view my photos
Mar 3, 2008 | 6:08 AM

Clinton omitted many things on the Chris Wallace show and as usual Clinton got in his face an intimidated Chris....heres the problem with your analysis...Clintons excuse was he had NO PROBABLE CAUSE FOR 8 YEARS? well if thats true after the 1993 WTC ATTACK 2 AFRICAN EMABASSY BOMBINGS, KHOBAR TOWERS IRAN WITH AL QAEDA AN THE USS COLE....what makes you think that President Bush had PROBABLE CAUSE until 9/11 and once that happened Bush too swift justice on Afghanistan...9/11 Genral Tommy Franks is on the ground in the Middle East making deals an plans with Saudis- 9/13 MCCAIN,FINSTEIN put together HR2500 bill an was passed to COMABAT TERRORISM GLOBALLY, 9/15 ruffly Bush adresses Congress, 9/25 the air campaign begings in Afghanistan an troops landed...thats swift justice! less than one month!
Page 1 of 2
1
2
 Last


Write your comment below:




MattyG

I am a MyFoxLocal user who hasn't yet written a bio.

Member Since: 1/16/2008


 

RSS: XMLWhat is RSS?