MyFox
 

Mike_Beaudet's Blog

by Mike_Beaudet from Dedham

Last Post 33 days Ago


Earlier this year, we reported how many police departments trade in their old guns when they get new ones. The dealers then sell the police guns, and sometimes they end up in the hands of criminals.

The Boston Police Department feels strongly about the issue and does NOT trade in any of its old guns. They destroy them, instead. They think it's a way to keep the streets safer. After we raised the issue, Governor Deval Patrick's administration said it would review the contract that allows police departments to trade in their guns. The review is over, and the governor is continuing to allow police departments to trade in their guns to dealers.

What do you think? Will criminals get guns regardless of whether the police trade them in? Or should police departments not take a chance that their old guns will be involved in a crime?

6 Comments |  Add a Comment

Member Comments Total Comments: 6
Page 1 of 1
HansMoleman view my photos
Jul 31, 2008 | 11:23 PM

By this logic, the Boston Police should not sell or trade in their used vehicles. What if the subsequent owner runs over a pedestrian, or uses it as a getaway vehicle in a robbery? Police cars must be sent to the shredder!

RodriguezAlways11 read my blog
Aug 1, 2008 | 2:31 AM

How Ironic, THEY ALWAYS< they end up in the hands of criminals!!
And this is the Agency where my tax dollars are going to protect me? So if they are not protecting me and obivously the criminals are not protecting me? What is a tax paying Citizen (sic) should do?

Davmac view my photos
Aug 1, 2008 | 2:25 PM

A gun is a tool, just like any other tool if the user does not use it properly it can be dangerous, to the user & those around him. If we eradicate all firearms from the shores of the continent, what do you think will happen, Utopia? No, the criminals will find another way to intimidate their victims to get what they want. Then do we eradicate knives? No more sliced bread. No more hammers, can’t build that deck out back this summer. Whatever is picked up in a threatening manner will have to be gotten rid of.
Instead of getting rid of the means, why don’t we look at the motivation? Get people back to work, get them invested in their community, and restore a sense of responsibility to them. Also increase the punishments for violent offenders. The theory that punishment is no deterrent didn’t make sense to me when I was 13 years old, 30+ years has only cemented the fact that it is very effective. Why do you think the gangs are using under age kids to do their dirty work?

1sckmnd read my blog
Aug 1, 2008 | 11:20 PM

Any criminals will get what they want any way they want it. How about making a deal with the gun company's to recycle the guns?

Xantun read my blog view my photos
Aug 4, 2008 | 8:17 PM

I seriously doubt that not allowing police to trade in guns is going to do anything in terms of lessening illegal guns. If anything, law-abiding citizens should be more concerned with the fact that there are many gun dealers who come here for trade shows who do NOT check backgrounds, and the fact that is nearly impossible to cross-reference firearm ID card applications to check and see if a person applying has spent time in a mental hospital (which would thereby exclude them from having a gun permit).

restrainingorder
Aug 5, 2008 | 4:58 PM

So the gov should waste more of my tax dollars by not doing a trade in?

They selling the guns thru legal channels. The gun only becomes illegal when somebody commits a crime and sells on the black market. If it's not a police gun being sold it'll be some other gun. I don't think the criminals are that particular.

Page 1 of 1


Write your comment below:




Mike_Beaudet

I am FOX25's investigative reporter.

Member Since: 10/17/2006