Jan 29, 2009 | 12:25 AM PST
Report This Post
Hello:
This evening I caught a piece about the USPS pondering cutting back on the amount of days that mail is delivered. I do beleive that the USPS will have to adjust their business model in reaction to this current economic crisis. However, I don't really understand
how the Oklahoma senator and the Post-Master General could make such a lucid statement about the lack of volume and importance of mail delivered on Tuesdays.
Obviously the Senator or our current Post-Master General hasn't faced the unemployment situation that many Americans are experiencing. In case you were unaware, the first day that many Americans can file their weekly unemployment claim is on Sundays. Take a day for processing and depending on their proximity to their perspective state's unemployment office most individuals do not receive their checks till Tuesday or Wednesday. The majority of them on Tuesday if they live in the densily populated Metro-areas like Boston.. If mail is stopped midweek it could mean that many Bostonians would have to wait a week to get a check.. How will that help anyone?
The national unemployment rate rose from 6.8 to 7.2 percent in December 2008 and was up by 2.3 percentage points from a year earlier. Sure, Oklahoma had an increase of non-farm employment of (+1.0 percent) but it also had a 4.9% unemployment rate in December. Imagine being the Senator from Oklahoma and telling 5% of your states population that you would have to wait a week to get a check.. It's 6% percent here:
Jan 28, 2009 | 07:50 PM PST
Report This Post
Ok, this goes down as one of Gov. Patrick's worst ideas - putting a
sales tax on beer and other alcohol you get at the package store.
Beer
is already expensive and loaded down with other hidden taxes, and
besides, we need it to get through this economic crisis! The governor
is also proposing to tax soda (don't drink it) and candy. And this is
bad news for kids and for our very special anchor Maria Stephanos, who
spends hundreds of dollars of her hard earned money on feeding candy to
station employees.
Governor, for the sake of Maria, please leave
the candy alone. And let's hope lawmakers stop this horrible beer tax.
Because if it happens, I might have to switch to Old Milwaukee.
Are you ok with the six-pack tax or is this just a horrible idea? Let me know your thoughts.
Jan 28, 2009 | 05:46 PM PST
Report This Post
Hi Maria and Mark
Re: $77,000 to upgrade TV's
Didn't anyone watch VB's sound off about this yesterday morning? It was also replayed at 5pm last night. He stated that the money for these are coming from the inmates own pockets not the taxpayers. Per VB, these monies are from the canteen where the inmates purchase gum and magazines and what not.
Jan 28, 2009 | 04:37 PM PST
Report This Post
okay I know what you are all thinking the former Speaker is history well this new speaker is just different then what we know and hope that others will get to know Speaker Robert A. Deleo because he has class because he was Chairman of House Ways & Means now he has a new roll to play Speaker for Life how does that sound to you all out there.
If you have a comment or Question about this New Speaker Then let me here from you as well.
Happy Blogging,
Chip Zigulis
Jan 28, 2009 | 04:15 PM PST
Report This Post
Are you
kidding me?! Why are inmates even allowed to have televisions?! The crooks
in prison get brand new flat screen televisions; the crooks in the Commonwealth
House and Senate get a pay raise. The taxpayers get the bill! This is a perfect
example of how the State of Massachusetts
and its' Government officials have their priorities screwed up big time. I
mean, is this a prison or a sports bar? Prison inmates do not deserve
those TV's - PERIOD! They are in there for committing a crime-some serious,
some maybe not so serious. But even still, they are in their to be PUNISHED.
Not to be able to have a "common area" and be allowed to watch TV and
have a good time. Prison isn't suppose to be fun. Prison is suppose to be a
place for inmates to serve time for their crime and realize what the have done.
I
grew up
always with the impression that you are in Prison because you broke
the law by committing a crime, you are paying time for the crime and so
you wouldn't cause anymore harm to the innocent people in society. I
guess I can say that I am not really shocked about this in a way.
Massachusetts wastes so
much money on unnecessary things that can be going toward much more
sufficient
and important issue it has. For example, the HORRIBLE roads, HORRIBLE
Bridges,
(some) Horrible School Systems and (some) HORRIBLE Politicians.
However, this I
feel is what really drew me to my limit. I mean, why on earth would you
want to
allow these inmates who have killed raped, stolen, robbed, etc. to have
the
freedom of watching TV? Yes, I understand that everyone has rights. But
as far
as I am concerned, when you commit a crime, YOU LOSE YOUR INDIVIDUAL
RIGHTS!!!
Anyone agree with me?! Please, tell me what you think about this.
Jan 28, 2009 | 03:27 PM PST
Report This Post
I am just furious that American people are so blinded by this smoothe talker....I am apalled he had the gall to speak to Al Arabiya...saying Our language would be nicer, and we will not use the term "War on Terror" I knew in time
Hussein would come forth and admit his Islamic back ground...yet he laughed when that was brought up during the campaign? I knew he was less than truthful and now he has proven it..I say let's see what this self centered, manipulative man will really do...
I really wonder how the families are feeling as they listen to this President utter those same words now that they have lost loved ones, husbands, daughters, brother's, sister's and Father's like the wording of how he is welcoming and delusional if he thinks relations with countries who HATE the USA and were resposnsible for the deaths of THEIR family members..
I also wonder what happened to his Aunt who was living in Boston in Public Housing and employed as well..."he had no idea" yet he accepted money from her for his "bought Presidency" but "oh she is back in Kenya" ... she was court ordered out of the country so how did she land in Boston in Housing while some poor people born in S. Boston cannot get in there...He still has not revealed his donors in the Arab countries.
Is this just myself questioning his moves and motives for trying to be the "peacemaker"I do not feel safe with this man at the helm...talk about "flip-flops" this disgusts me! Oh yes I think this man thinks is "the messiah" and oh how he loves that camera and acting in front of it daily...he makes sure he looks right into it...
.
Jan 28, 2009 | 09:27 AM PST
Report This Post
http://www.flickr.com/photos/kevinmoore001/308736923
1/
You want a higher return on your investment = so you lower your quality standards = your suppliers, distributors and competitors want the same so they follow your example
= you loose customers = so you out source and Lay off people = less consumers are employed so your operating costs rise = you raze prices to off set your operating costs = you loose customers = you Lay off more people and your remaining staff have to do more for the same paycheck = your quality drops = you loose more customers = less consumers are employed so your operating costs rise = you raze prices to off set your operating costs = less consumers are employed so your operating costs rise = you raze prices to off set your operating costs = you loose customers = you Lay off more people and your remaining staff have to do more for the same paycheck = your quality drops = you loose more customers = less consumers are employed so your operating costs rise = you raze prices to off set your operating costs = less consumers are employed so your operating costs rise = you raze prices to off set your operating costs = you loose customers = you Lay off more people and your remaining staff have to do more for the same paycheck = your quality drops = you loose more customers = less consumers are employed so your operating costs rise = you raze prices to off set your operating costs = less consumers are employed so your operating costs rise = you raze prices to off set your operating costs = you loose customers = you Lay off more people and your remaining staff have to do more for the same paycheck = your quality drops = you loose more customers = less consumers are employed so your operating costs rise = you raze prices to off set your operating costs = you Lay off more people = you Lay off more people = you Lay off more people = Less Consumers are Employed so your operating costs rise. How Is Your Return on your Investment going?
Jan 27, 2009 | 09:13 PM PST
Report This Post
Check out the
new video we got of Sal DiMasi making his final exit from the
State House (in his massive, campaign-paid SUV of course!)
Seems appropriate he went out smiling and waving goodbye. He was a jovial
guy but unfortunately squandered his opportunity by allowing close friends to
use their access to influence legislation.
My question is, where do you think the next time we'll see Sal DiMasi will
be? In front of a judge? Registering as a lobbyist himself? Or just at a North
End restaurant spending all his campaigning cash?
I'm voting for the judge.
Jan 27, 2009 | 07:09 PM PST
Report This Post
V.B. Doesn't Blogojawich sound like a bolonga sandwich? Is That why he is so full of
himself?
---Dog Cookie Lady of Barre.--
Jan 27, 2009 | 05:26 PM PST
Report This Post
Where are we headed America? For those of you who call information, Right Wing Rhetoric, I’m certain you won’t like this blog. We are at a point where our nation is being threatened from with-in by an ideology that encompasses a lot of far left theories. If you have followed the rise to stardom, of Chavez in Venezuela, you can understand my concern when you hear the latest discussions taking place with-in this Administration. The following headlines pretty much say what they are thinking:
Reich: Unions Can Save This Economy
Clinton-era Labor Secretary Robert Reich says bank bailouts won't revive the U.S. economy, but an expansion of union membership might, and he says controversial “card-check” legislation should be passed by the Congress now in order to stimulate job growth.
If passed, union organizers would no longer have to conduct a secret ballot election to get employees of a small business represented by a national union.
Pelosi: Nationalization of Banks Possible
Monday, January 26, 2009 2:59 PM
By: Gene J. Koprowski
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) says that the idea of nationalization, or perhaps partial nationalization, of America's leading banks is gaining currency among U.S. policymakers.
"Whatever you want to call it," Speaker Pelosi told ABC News, "If we are strengthening them (the banks), then the American people should get some of the upside of that strengthening. Some people call that nationalization."
When you couple this with the move to silence Talk Radio, worries about our 2nd amendment rights and the un proven Global Warming Culture that is so prevalent in this administration, many educated Americans get a little nervous. We’re talking about a real threat here that is a greater threat to our freedom than Osama and his henchmen.
What happens after the soon to be coming Amnesty of millions of illegal aliens, 20 million more voters will be ever grateful and vote accordingly. How long will it be before the military is reduced to a minimal force and actually replaced by a national militia. Think it’s impossible, I hope you’re right, because if you aren’t we are in for a ride down the slippery slope to an Oligarchy form of government which translates to, ruled by a few.
Most Americans feel this is an impossibility because the majority wouldn’t allow it to happen. The problem with that theory is that in America the majority doesn’t have the power. In our present situation, we through our vote last November, have given the Legislative Branch, The Executive Branch and with the power of those two in the hands of a few, it will soon encompass the Judicial Branch of government to the far left in our society.
The United States was founded on the basic principles of freedom. The drafters of our Bill of Rights and our Constitution never intended for one group to have total control over our society. They felt the checks and balances of a 3 part government would be sufficient to protect our republic. Just think for a moment about what would happen if we had a National Militia loyal to one administration, frightening is how I would put it, but who am I, just some right wing whacko who worries about things like this. Remember, I warned you liberals that you wouldn’t like this blog, so don’t blame me if you have nightmares or scary thoughts.
My goal in writing this piece is just to make people think. Hopefully none of these scenarios will ever take place. America is a treasure that belongs to her people. Nothing nor anyone should ever be allowed to change that. When our liberties are at stake, we the people will make ourselves heard over the roar of any government.
And that’s my opinion,
Don
Jan 27, 2009 | 12:54 PM PST
Report This Post
Who would you rather interview?
Jan 27, 2009 | 12:21 AM PST
Report This Post
Definition of Conservative, he who stands up for our rights. Where are all the Conservatives in the House and Senate? What happened to our Friend Senator Ensign? Have they just folded their tents and settled in for a comfortable term? I am angry, and any conservative worth their salt should be angry about the railroading of the Timothy Geithner appointment. The man didn’t even pay his taxes. He has his mark all over the big bank bailout, as well as this failure to pay self employment taxes for several years. If that were you or I, we would have been swallowed up and spit out looking like a wad of used up gum. What happens to him? He's now in charge of the IRS.
I guess you have to be a liberal to understand these things. A conservative wouldn’t hire his brother with a record like that. 10 Senators of Republican ilk voted for his appointment. I guess the communication from their constituents didn’t reach them in time. Oh I forgot in this new beginning they don’t work for us anymore they work for the administration and don’t want to rock the boat. We already saw what happens when we rush a program through, remember just in the last few months, the huge 700 Billion dollar bailout that was going to solve all our banking problems. We were told that if it didn’t pass, the world was going to end, and all business as we knew it would be gone. All that the bail out did was let the banks buy littler banks, and get stronger and more defiant. Heck some of these banks we bailed out with our tax money are stronger than our own government.
To my liberal friends, and some of you republicans and blue dog democrats who voted for this change, I would like to ask just how far are you willing to go before you realize your mistake. I know that Socialism is just another word to you, but have you checked the dictionary for its definition? What will be your turning point, maybe the Amnesty of the illegals, or will it take something more like the silencing of talk radio and any opposition to liberalism. How about the battle that’s coming on the 2nd amendment, will you give up your guns to them without a fight? I’m not trying to be radical, I’m just stating what I believe is coming down the road. Now Ms. Pelosi says that by giving our kids condoms and other devices as part of this so called new stimulus we will save money by not having unwanted pregnancies. If there is a mechanic in the house, please report to the Speakers office, we have a loose screw in there.
We have a chance for redemption, if we somehow can open enough eyes between now and the 2010 Congressional elections, just maybe we can cut down on the administration ability to railroad legislation. This will mean turning out weak republicans as well as liberal democrats. We need people who live by, and understand the Constitution of the United States. We have to be prepared to battle the National Press, as well as fight for our place on ballots with liberal registrars. Don’t get confused, this can not be a race war, this is a race to war, to claim our God given rights.
And that’s my opinion,
Don
Jan 26, 2009 | 06:21 PM PST
Report This Post
Are we Socialists yet Daddy
Norman Mattoon Thomas (November 20, 1884 to December 19, 1968) was a leading American socialist, pacifist, and six-time presidential candidate for the Socialist Party of America. He said this in a 1944 speech:
"The American people will never knowingly adopt socialism. But, under the name of "liberalism," they will adopt every fragment of the socialist program, until one day America will be a socialist nation, without knowing how it happened. I no longer need to run as a Presidential Candidate for the Socialist Party. The Democrat Party has adopted our platform."
**** "The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money." ~~Margaret Thatcher
check out this video, it's worth the time. Don
http://www.wimp.com/thegovernment/
Jan 26, 2009 | 04:17 PM PST
Report This Post
Now that the President is on track and is developing a stimulus package for tax payers, Gov. Patrick is stabbing us in the back with his tax hike on gasoline to take it all away and then some. I guess this is how we work together. The Feds. Give us and the State takes it away.
Jan 26, 2009 | 01:17 PM PST
Report This Post
When all the King's soldiers stood at attention and crowned Sal for another term as House Speaker, I knew the rails were greased & they were just giving him one final stroking of his Ego before the feces hit the fan.
Buh-Bye Sal, too bad you tanked the state economy for the past 3 years by squelching any real discussion on expanded gaming in the state. I hope Suffolk Downs names a race for you in 2009..for horses that haven't finished in the money in 2008-2009!
Jan 26, 2009 | 11:24 AM PST
Report This Post
I'm watching The View, and Gov. Blagojevich is literally making me ill! I've never seen a political with cojones the size of Illinois!!!
Jan 26, 2009 | 06:06 AM PST
Report This Post
why he once proposed giving the ability to vote in local elections (i.e Mayoral) to everyone including non-citizens? I double dog dare you?
I'll never spend my votee on someone who holds such little value in it!
Jan 25, 2009 | 06:38 PM PST
Report This Post
Whose entitled to what? Who is entitled to what and what does the term entitlements mean? If you take a good look at what has happened to America, the biggest culprit is our entitlement mentality. We are all guilty of some type of entitlement wish. Every where you look there are organizations to join that promise you a voice in government, or it could just be your membership in Aarp. Why do you belong? In most cases people belong to get benefits from the government. Many people are asking our government for free medical, Free education, for free housing and free food. Ask the average American under 50 today and they will say these are entitlements. Who made them entitlements? There are strings attached to each benefit we get from our government, strings that make us more and more dependent on government.
It’s the fallacy that we all are entitled to houses, that brought down the housing financial world. You can’t give people what they haven’t earned and expect them to respect it. It’s the fallacy that we are all entitled to medical benefits, that has ruined many a company just trying to survive. The cost of medical insurance is so high because of the fact that so many frivolous lawsuits have had huge monetary awards at the expense of the companies. The jury of their peers felt that the victim needed to have millions of dollars for the loss of a finger in an accident. I don’t know about you but if someone offered me a million dollars for a single finger, I’d hand it to them with the bloody knife still in my hand. I sure wouldn’t feel that I was entitled to it. We have families, who have been on the welfare roles for decades, why are they there? Because they feel they are entitled, the government told them they were. Our government made quotas for higher education and federal hiring practices, were these people always qualified? No but the system said they were entitled.
I don’t want to sound like a scrooge but who do you think has paid for all these things? Me, that’s who, and I have never so much as drawn unemployment in my life. You know what, I’m tired of paying everybody’s way. I was taught at an early age that we were lucky to be born in America because we have 3 basic rights no other country had; The right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. I was taught that they weren’t free rights either, if needed, we were expected to fight for the first two rights,and the third one meant courting a wife and that never came cheap.
Who was the dummy who made up all these new rights that have broken our system? Does the term New Deal or Great Society or War on Poverty come to mind? I’m going to para-phrase this next statement because I don’t have the actual quote in front of me; In 1787, Alexander Tyler (a Scottish history professor) made the following statement; A democracy will only last about 200 years, because when it’s people find out that they can vote themselves money from the treasury, they will and it will destroy the whole concept of democracy. Think about it, this was stated just 11years after our Declaration of Independence was made. I wonder how many new rights or shall we say entitlements will come out from the administration in the next week.
And that’s my opinion,
Don
Jan 25, 2009 | 12:05 AM PST
Report This Post
Just in case you think Freedom is forever. A few month ago I saw a video from England about gun control. I hadn’t given it much thought at the time, because living in Nevada, I really never considered that someone could ever take away my privilege of owning guns. Now that I’ve heard some of the rhetoric come out of Washington D.C. this week I am growing more and more concerned. If Robert Reich can get away with stating that the stimulus package should be tied to a provision, that stops companies from hiring qualified laborers to rebuild our infra structure, well than I guess anything can happen. Could gun legislation be far behind?
Stop and think for a minute, take time to watch this video from England. I guaranty you they didn't think it could happen either. It is now easier for a criminal in England to buy a gun on the street from the Black Market, than it is for me to go get a new pistol at the gun shop here in Nevada.
Here we are proposing to give the prisoners at Gitmo the same rights as Americans in the Judicial System yet our rights have been slowly evaporating for years now. When are we as Americans going to say enough is enough? Even if you don’t own a gun, do you want your right to do so taken away? This is not something that should have to be fought for by lawyers and decided by judges, this is an inalienable right given us by the Constitution. If any fighting comes from it, it will be by the people themselves who cherish freedom above all else.
Please take the time to visit this site and listen closely to the voice of freedom lost.
(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qGVAQOUi6ec)
And that’s my opinion,
Don
Jan 24, 2009 | 01:24 AM PST
Report This Post
The government is working on a new stimulus plan tied to the Infra Structure of America.
Leave it to good old Robert Reich to show his colors first. Not happy with just creating jobs, now he wants to force companies to hire unqualified labors to work on your roads and bridges? We have millions of qualified individuals, who have worked all their lives to be good at what they do and Reich thinks we should hire those who haven’t done a thing without any of the hard earned experience, to fix our infra structure. Sorry RR but that idea stinks. When my family is traveling along the Interstate system at 70 MPH, I want to know that the guy who tightened the bolts on that bridge knew what the hell he was doing. We will always have some chronic unemployed here in America. I don’t care how you manipulate the system Mr. Reich, some of these bums don’t like to work.
Here we are in a major recession with thousands of construction companies who have paid into the system for years, dying on the vine for lack of jobs, and he wants to throw a monkey in the mixer, to saddle us with some of his liberal ideals. Go jump in the lake Mr. Reich, or better yet, go out and earn a real living for a change, and see what it takes to survive outside of politics. I have a friend who has spent years building a grading and excavation company who is on the verge of bankruptcy, because of this economy. You want him to fail so somebody of color with no experience can get ahead? This man has paid his taxes and has somehow kept most of his men working for 20 years, and that seems to mean nothing to you?
I had hoped beyond hope that common sense would at least be given a chance of survival in this administration, but it looks like it’s going to be a very caustic four years. I say four years because knowing the American people as I feel I do, they will become totally turned off by this kind of governance. The great masses of middle of the road republicans, and blue dog democrats who they fooled into helping this administration get elected, will be watching in disbelief at this type of behavior. We don’t even need Rush and Hannity to bring it to our attention when they pull stuff like this. I’m afraid this is just the beginning. They seem to feel they have a mandate to do what ever they feel and damn the consequences.
The only hope we have is to smother them with cards and letters and phone calls demanding common sense in all they do. I have been asking for calm, and to allow this president time, to show his abilities, but I guess the only ability I’ve seen so far, is that he is living up to his liberal billing. If this attitude of "we won, so get used to it," prevails, you will find a rocky road ahead Mr. President. It’s time to reign in these far-left supporters and put some common sense to work, for the sake of this country.
And that’s my opinion,
Don